What utility is there in identifying as a victim?
Perhaps it could help you be rid of guilt at having suffered at the hands of something truly beyond your control.
Or it could help you cultivate resentment at the thing which victimized you, in order to better focus your efforts on resistance.
But at what cost?
To be a victim is to be defeated and without agency, and occasionally, that truly is the state you’re in.
If someone threatens you with violence and demands your money, for the duration of that interaction, you are a victim.
But two weeks later, when the gun and the criminal are nowhere near you, are you still a victim?
You are if you choose to be.
All your problems can be blamed on the attacker, every financial woe, every insecurity, it can all be that guy’s fault. If not for the mugger, you would have had the money to do so and so, and then something great would have happened, and then you wouldn’t be in such a sorry state.
Is that narrative true?
If you believe it.
But perhaps you were walking somewhere when you obviously shouldn’t have been, and the entire situation could have been avoided if you had possessed better situational awareness.
That’s a difficult narrative to digest. Condemning. Unsympathetic.
But if that is the story, the power lies in your hands. Not the attackers.
Because the truth is, we identify as victims because it allows us to narrow our own influence in an attempt to shirk responsibility for the chaotic world around us.
Victims exchange power and responsibility for the illusion of safety and innocence in the wake of their missteps.
Is that an appealing trade?